13 May
2007
13 May
'07
4:34 p.m.
""Martin v. Löwis"" <martin@v.loewis.de> wrote in message news:464764C9.8090707@v.loewis.de... |> I don't understand the point of a "security release" made up to a year | > after commit, especially in view of the first quoted paragraph. A security release is presumably a response to a serious problem. | I think we would need to restrict the total number of releases | made per year. The one-year limit may be debatable, and immediate | releases might be possible, as long as there is some provision | that releases are not made at a too-high rate. I would agree, but... has there been more that the one security release that I know about? tjr