30 Apr
2015
30 Apr
'15
7:52 a.m.
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 4:48 PM, Yury Selivanov
Nathaniel,
On 2015-04-29 7:35 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
What I do feel strongly about is that whatever syntax we end up with, there should be*some* accurate human-readable description of*what it is*. AFAICT the PEP currently doesn't have that.
How to define human-readable description of how unary minus operator works?
In a PEP you should probably give grammar that is not the actual grammar from the implementation, but matches the grammar used in the reference manual on docs.python.org. -- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)