I haven't seen any strong objections, so I would like to go ahead and commit PEP 3155 (*) soon. Is anyone against it?
I'm not against it, but I have some questions. Does you a working implementing? Do you have a patch for issue #9276 using __qualname__? Maybe not a fully working patch, but a proof-of-concept? Could you add examples on instances? I suppose that it gives the same result than classes: C.__qualname__ == C().__qualname__ C.f.__qualname__ == C().f.__qualname__ Le 19/11/2011 00:15, Barry Warsaw a écrit :
I'd like the PEP to explain why this is a better solution than re-establishing introspectability that was available through unbound methods.
__qualname__ works also on nested functions. Is it a new feature? Or was it already possible in Python 2 to compute the qualified name? Victor