That sounds like unnecessary generality, and also suggests that the API might support precisions way beyond what is realistic. On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 4:39 AM, francismb <francismb@email.de> wrote:
Hi Victor,
On 10/18/2017 01:14 AM, Victor Stinner wrote:
I updated my PEP 564 to add time.process_time_ns(): https://github.com/python/peps/blob/master/pep-0564.rst
The HTML version should be updated shortly: https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0564/
** In practive, the resolution of 1 nanosecond **
** no need for resolution better than 1 nanosecond in practive in the Python standard library.**
practice vs practice
If I understood you correctly on Python-ideas (here just for the records, otherwise please ignore it):
why not something like (please change '_in' for what you like):
time.time_in(precision) time.monotonic_in(precision)
where precision is an enumeration for: 'seconds', 'milliseconds' 'microseconds'... (or 's', 'ms', 'us', 'ns', ...)
Thanks, --francis _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/ guido%40python.org
-- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)