20 Apr
2006
20 Apr
'06
2:02 a.m.
Phillip J. Eby wrote:
How much any of that could have also applied to the distutils at one time, I don't know. My point is merely that setuptools has enough commercial value to make me believe that sponsorship for features shouldn't be that hard to come by, and there are certainly worse things I could do with my work days.
I'm glad to hear that you seem to be finding support for ongoing work on setuptools (I'm *really* glad to hear that; it's always good when people get funded to work on open source). I'm also happy to hear that Neal wants to study the complete source base of setuptools. Perhaps that means I won't have to :-) Regards, Martin