Guido van Rossum wrote:
I'm not sure it needs clarifying; it's the reference manual after all, not a tutorial.
I'd rather let the grammar speak for itself; there's no ambiguity in that, and the words are just there to clarify the *semantics*.
Also, I'll freely admit that I made the mistake of reading the "string literal concatenation" bit out of context. Reading the preceding section on string literals in general first (which includes the relevant snippet from the grammar), probably would have made it clearer what was going on. http://www.python.org/dev/doc/devel/ref/strings.html Cheers, Nick. I guess there was a reason K&R used ';' after all. . . -- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan@email.com | Brisbane, Australia --------------------------------------------------------------- http://boredomandlaziness.skystorm.net