No, that would be time.monotonous(). This is time.monotonic(), the function that can only play a single note at a time. Uh, I mean time.monophonic().

Hmm, this is harder than it looks.

On 28 March 2012 14:48, Matt Joiner <anacrolix@gmail.com> wrote:

time.monotonic(): The uneventful and colorless function.

On Mar 28, 2012 9:30 PM, "Larry Hastings" <larry@hastings.org> wrote:
On 03/28/2012 01:56 PM, R. David Murray wrote:
On Wed, 28 Mar 2012 23:05:59 +1100, Steven D'Aprano<steve@pearwood.info>  wrote:
+1 on Nick's suggestion of try_monotonic. It is clear and obvious and doesn't
mislead.
How about "monotonicest".

(No, this is not really a serious suggestion.)

"monotonish".

Thus honoring the Principle Of Least Monotonishment,


//arry/
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/anacrolix%40gmail.com

_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/me%40jonathanfrench.net