Guido van Rossum wrote:
I consider the above PEP ready for review by the developers. Please comment.
After approval, the next step would be to implement phase 1 for 2.3. Step two would then be on the plate for 2.4.
That looks OK to me. I the Emacs-style comment in fact compatible with Emacs?
According to Martin, it is compatible. If it's not we'll make it so :-)
-- Marc-Andre Lemburg CEO eGenix.com Software GmbH