On 6 Jun 2021, at 16:58, Andrei Kulakov <andrei.avk@gmail.com> wrote:
The difference is that, IIRC, solving the problem is finding and removing all subsets that are unneeded to create an exact cover, so it's kind of arriving at it from a different direction, but 'exact cover' definition itself is a good match.
I’m not sure it’s a quite the same - it doesn’t require that the sets in the cover have cardinality 1, which I think Ethan does.
And the ‘exact’ requirement (that each bit is covered once) surely doesn’t apply.
It’s more like “full cover by singletons”.