On 13 May 2016, at 08:07, Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> wrote:
On 05/12/2016 01:59 PM, Sjoerd Job Postmus wrote:
On 12 May 2016, at 21:30, Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> wrote:
If you need bytes support for your paths, there's at least one [1] that has that support.
So if I would need bytes support, I should submit a pull request to <arbitrary but awesome library> which replaces usage of the stdlib pathlib with another variant, upon which they will decline the pull request because it introduces another "useless" dependency.
My apologies, I thought you were talking about your own code.
As far as <arbitrary but awesome library> -- it wouldn't be awesome to me if I couldn't pass in the data types I need.
-- ~Ethan~
I just hope you are right. Thank you (and Brett) for clearing things up for me. My apologies if I came off as (a bit) harsh.