On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 08:06, Cameron Simpson <cs@zip.com.au> wrote:
On 25Jul2009 10:25, Gregory P. Smith <greg@krypto.org> wrote:
| On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 4:28 PM, Thomas Wouters<thomas@python.org> wrote:
| > So attached (and at http://codereview.appspot.com/96125/show ) is a
| > preliminary fix, correcting the problem with os.fork(), os.forkpty() and
| > os.fork1(). This doesn't expose a general API for C code to use, for two
| > reasons: it's not easy, and I need this fix more than I need the API change
| > :-) (I actually need this fix myself for Python 2.4, but it applies fairly
| > cleanly.)
| This looks good to me.

Where's this stand with respect to the upcoming Python 2.6.3?

Unless anyone speaks up, I'll submit the fix (without the change in semantics on AIX) to release26-maint early next week, so it would be in 2.6.3.

Thomas Wouters <thomas@python.org>

Hi! I'm a .signature virus! copy me into your .signature file to help me spread!