On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 08:06, Cameron Simpson <cs@zip.com.au> wrote:
On 25Jul2009 10:25, Gregory P. Smith <greg@krypto.org> wrote:
| On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 4:28 PM, Thomas Wouters<thomas@python.org> wrote:
| > So attached (and at http://codereview.appspot.com/96125/show ) is a
| > preliminary fix, correcting the problem with os.fork(), os.forkpty() and
| > os.fork1(). This doesn't expose a general API for C code to use, for two
| > reasons: it's not easy, and I need this fix more than I need the API change
| > :-) (I actually need this fix myself for Python 2.4, but it applies fairly
| > cleanly.)
|
| This looks good to me.
[...]

Where's this stand with respect to the upcoming Python 2.6.3?

Unless anyone speaks up, I'll submit the fix (without the change in semantics on AIX) to release26-maint early next week, so it would be in 2.6.3.

--
Thomas Wouters <thomas@python.org>

Hi! I'm a .signature virus! copy me into your .signature file to help me spread!