1 Jul
2000
1 Jul
'00
1:23 a.m.
tim wrote:
That would make SRE's job clear here, yes? And in a way that allows the now-failing test to pass again?
sure. quoting from python-checkins: RCS file: /cvsroot/python/python/dist/src/Lib/test/output/test_sre,v ... test_sre - === Failed incorrectly ('\\x00ffffffffffffff', '\377', 0, 'found', '\377') === Failed incorrectly ('^(.+)?B', 'AB', 0, 'g1', 'A') ... still messes up on nested repetitions, but that's entirely different problem... </F>