![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/de311342220232e618cb27c9936ab9bf.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
5 Jun
2020
5 Jun
'20
4:52 p.m.
On 06/05/2020 07:32 AM, Mark Shannon wrote:
3. It can be implemented on top of the multiprocessing module, for testing. A more efficient implementation can be developed once sub-interpreters prove useful.
Isn't part of the impetus for in-process sub-interpreters the Python-embedded-in-language-X use-case? Isn't multiprocessing a poor solution then? -- ~Ethan~