Dec. 2, 2003
4:02 p.m.
Alex Martelli <aleaxit@yahoo.com> writes:
Since these functions or types are going to be in operator, I think we can afford to "spend" two names to distinguish functionality (even though attgetter and itemgetter look nowhere as neat as extract -- I don't have better suggestions offhand).
operator.getattr and operator.getitem? Paul. -- This signature intentionally left blank