If you want any kind of traction on this I recommend filing an opinionated issue on this (explaining why the current behavior is wrong).

On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 1:25 PM <dw-git@d-woods.co.uk> wrote:
Daniel Moisset wrote:
> I might expect that in a "case D(something=__y)" you get the mangling for
> __y, but I'm not sure what the implementation does now and I'm writing from
> my phone

Yes - that case does what you'd expect.

Thanks for the reply.
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-leave@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/
Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/3BALIBTV3ATAEC6G5ZJKAFBASZG4B5AP/
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/


--
--Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
Pronouns: he/him (why is my pronoun here?)