"JJ" == Jack Jansen <jack@oratrix.nl> writes:
JJ> I'm also interested in discussing whether a patch like this is JJ> appropriate while we're in beta. On the one hand I would say JJ> it is, because the feature is disabled by default. On the JJ> other hand there are changes (albeit mainly cosmetic ones) in JJ> a large number of places. Another argument for allowing this JJ> even while in beta is that I really really want it for Mac OS JJ> X (but this might not be a very strong argument, I guess:-). I tend toward the more conservative, especially with changes that touch lots of .c files, so I'd say -1. But it looks from the patch dialog that Guido's already approved of this in principle, so I'll revise that to a -0. -Barry