On Tue, 26 Feb 2002, Guido Van Rossum wrote:
Given the number of OS/2 EMX specific changes to dynload_shlib.c, wouldn't it be better to create a separate dynload_os2.c?
Its just occurred to me that you might in fact be referring to the changes to import.c, which were in the same commit (& thus the same checkin message) and were extensive. I did try to make it clear in the checkin message that changes to multiple files were committed.
It seems to be de rigeur to commit a single file at a time; something I hadn't appreciated and don't remember being advised about. I will follow this practive from now on.
No need -- you're right, I mistook the diff, but that's purely my fault. Multi-file commits are quite common when they're related. --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)