On 1 Jul 2014 11:28, "Alex Gaynor" <alex.gaynor@gmail.com> wrote:
I've come up with a new approach, which I believe is most likely to be successful, but I'll need help to implement it.
The idea is to find the most recent commit which is a parent of both the ``2.7`` and ``default`` branches. Then take every single change to an
related file on the ``default`` branch, and attempt to replay it on the ``2.7`` branch. Require manual review on each commit to make sure it compiles, and to ensure it doesn't make any backwards incompatible changes.
I think this provides the most iterative and guided approach to getting
``ssl`` this
done.
Sounds promising, although it may still have some challenges if the SSL code depends on earlier changes to other code.
I can do all the work of reviewing each commit, but I need some help from a mercurial expert to automate the cherry-picking/rebasing of every single commit.
What do folks think? Does this approach make sense? Anyone willing to help with the mercurial scripting?
For the Mercurial part, it's probably worth posing that as a Stack Overflow question: Given two named branches in http://hg.python.org (default and 2.7) and 4 files (Python module, C module, tests, docs): - find the common ancestor - find all the commits affecting those files on default & graft them to 2.7 (with a chance to test and edit each one first) It's just a better environment for asking & answering that kind of question :) Cheers, Nick.
Cheers, Alex
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/ncoghlan%40gmail.com