On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 7:33 PM, MRAB
On 2013-02-13 13:23, Lennart Regebro wrote:
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Serhiy Storchaka
wrote: I prefer "x = '%s%s%s%s' % (a, b, c, d)" when string's number is more than 3 and some of them are literal strings.
This has the benefit of being slow both on CPython and PyPy. Although using .format() is even slower. :-)
How about adding a class method for catenation:
str.cat(a, b, c, d) str.cat([a, b, c, d]) # Equivalent to "".join([a, b, c, d])
Each argument could be a string or a list of strings.
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/fijall%40gmail.com
I actually wonder. There seems to be the consensus to avoid += (to some extent). Can someone commit the change to urrllib then? I'm talking about reverting http://bugs.python.org/issue1285086 specifically