30 Aug
2005
30 Aug
'05
1:47 p.m.
On 30/08/05, JustFillBug
On 2005-08-30, Anthony Baxter
wrote: On Tuesday 30 August 2005 11:26, Raymond Hettinger wrote:
My major issue is with the names - partition() doesn't sound right to me.
FWIW, I am VERY happy with the name partition().
I'm +1 on the functionality, and +1 on the name partition(). The only other name that comes to mind is 'separate()', but a) I always spell it 'seperate' (and I don't need another lamdba <wink>) b) It's too similar in name to 'split()'
trisplit()
split3() ? I'm +1 on the name "partition" but I think this is shorter, communicates the similarity to split and the fact that it always returns exactly three parts. Oren