FWIW I copied the version you posted into the peps repo already, since it provides a significant update to the last version there. On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 2:02 PM, Guido van Rossum <guido@python.org> wrote:
I'm reviewing this now.
Martin, can you please submit the new version of your PEP as a Pull Request to the new peps repo on GitHub? https://github.com/python/peps
--Guido
On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 7:45 AM, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan@gmail.com> wrote:
On 14 July 2016 at 00:15, Martin Teichmann <lkb.teichmann@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi list,
another round for PEP 487, is there any chance it still makes it into Python 3.6?
The PEP should be effectively done, I updated the examples in it, given that I implemented the PEP I could actually test the examples, so now they work.
The implementation is at http://bugs.python.org/issue27366, including documentation and tests. Unfortunately nobody has reviewed the patch yet.
The new version of the PEP is attached.
+1 from me for this version - between them, this and PEP 520 address everything I hoped to achieve with PEP 422, and a bit more besides.
There's no BDFL delegation in place for this one though, so it's really Guido's +1 that you need :)
Cheers, Nick.
-- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/guido%40python.org
-- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
-- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)