31 Jan
2003
31 Jan
'03
8:45 p.m.
[Michael Hudson]
It's unclear to me that scheme is more dynamic than Python.
I don't think Scheme is more dynamic either. The language has set types that you just don't happen to have access to or see directly. But there is no clear cut way of defining new types short of writing it in C. It was bad enough reading Paul Graham calling Python "water-down Lisp with infix syntax and no macros", but having Scheme being considered more dynamic is blasphemy in my book (but that might be because Scheme was forced upon me in school =). -Brett