May 5, 2004
4:16 p.m.
Guido van Rossum wrote:
There doesn't need to be 100% agreement. This thread (which is indeed getting nowhere) started with my assertion that we should do it, using late binding. I haven't changed my mind yet. I'm still waiting for someone to volunteer to review the code once more and check it in.
Sure. And this was what I was referring to. Lotsa noise, little traction. <wink> This isn't meant as a slap at anyone - I am quite aware of time limitations. I guess I was hoping to prod someone into stepping forward and doing the work. Anthony -- Anthony Baxter <anthony@interlink.com.au> It's never too late to have a happy childhood.