March 28, 2012
12:56 p.m.
On Wed, 28 Mar 2012 23:05:59 +1100, Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> wrote:
+1 on Nick's suggestion of try_monotonic. It is clear and obvious and doesn't mislead.
How about "monotonicest". (No, this is not really a serious suggestion.) However, time.steadiest might actually work. --David