On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 11:00 AM, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis@pitrou.net> wrote:
On Fri, 04 May 2018 00:21:54 +0000 Ray Donnelly <mingw.android@gmail.com> wrote:
Yes, on Windows there's always a python?.dll.
macOS is an interesting one. For Anaconda 5.0 I read somewhere (how's that for a useless reference - and perhaps I got the wrong end of the stick) that Python for all Unixen should use a statically linked interpreter so I happily went ahead and did that.
A statically linked Python can also be significantly faster (10 to 20% IIRC, more perhaps on ARM). I think you already know about that :-)
Indeed, and it worked out well on Intel too. Thanks for the recommendation.
Anyway, it is obviously safer for us to do what upstream does and I will try to post some benchmarks of static vs shared to the list so we can discuss it.
I have no idea what our default builds do on macOS, I'll let Ned Deily or another mac expert answer (changing the topic in the hope he notices this subthread :-)).
And thanks for doing this. For the benchmarks I think I should build Python 3.6.5 (or would 3.7.0b4 be better?) from pyperformance built each way using the AD scripts and reply here with the results. If I do not get it done today then I hope to get them ready by Monday.
Regards
Antoine.
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/mingw.android%40gmail.com