Dec. 30, 2009
11:20 p.m.
2009/12/30 Olemis Lang <olemis@gmail.com>:
Hmmm ... One of the issues I didn't notice ...
IMO +1 for leaving it as it was before (i.e. __unittest) because :
- the double underscore should mean (CMIIW) that it's an implementation detail - not few libs use that name already ;o)
+0.5 for adding `__unittest_ignore_traceback` or something shorter (e.g. `__unittest_ignore`) too ...
+1 for documenting that «hack»
Someone should probably file a tracker request about this. -- Regards, Benjamin