hello Members,
If any one is working AIML library for Python 3.5/3.6 version? Please let
me know about it,
thanks
On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 10:50 PM, Guido van Rossum
Sounds like an oversight in a backwater of a header file. We should add the PY symbols and deprecate the others.
--Guido (mobile)
On Oct 3, 2016 10:17 AM, "Skip Montanaro"
wrote: Thanks, Victor, but that's not quite what I was asking. Replacing "RO" with "READONLY" is clearly no big deal. My question was more wondering why I didn't find myself replacing PY_RO with PY_READONLY". Both names were part of the Public API in the early 90s, I suspect, and one of that set of flags does have a "PY_" prefix. Why didn't these flags (and the T_* flags in structmember.h) get swept up in all the hubbub around the grand renaming.
Skip
On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 10:39 AM, Victor Stinner
wrote: 2016-10-03 15:37 GMT+02:00 Skip Montanaro
: While starting to port the Python Sybase module to Python 3, among other hurdles, I noticed that RO is no longer defined. Looking in structmember.h,
RO was an alias to READONLY. READONLY still exists in Python 3, just use this name.
You might create an alias in your code if it is missing:
#ifndef RO # define RO READONLY #endif
Victor
Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/guido% 40python.org
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/ naitikchandak213%40gmail.com