On November 28, 2017 2:51:14 PM EST, Mike Miller <python-dev@mgmiller.net> wrote:
This may have gotten bogged down again. Could we get the output of
datetime.isoformat() parsed at a minimum? Perfection is not required.
Looks like there is a patch or two and test cases on the bug.
-Mike
Could anyone put this five year-old bug about parsing iso8601 format date-times
on the front burner?
http://bugs.python.org/issue15873
In the comments there's a lot of hand-wringing about different variations that
bogged it down, but right now I only need it to handle the output of
datetime.isoformat():
>>> dt.isoformat()
'2017-10-20T08:20:08.986166+00:00'
Perhaps if we could get that minimum first step in, it could be iterated on and
made more lenient in the future.
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/paul%40ganssle.io