On Dec 19, 2008 2:20pm, Fabio Zadrozny <fabiofz@gmail.com> wrote:
> You're right, thanks (guess I'll use that option then).
>
>
>
> Now, is it a bug that Python 3.0 doesn't run unbuffered when
>
> specifying -u or PYTHONUNBUFFERED, or was this support dropped?
>
>

Well, ``python -h`` still lists it. That means either the output for -h needs to be fixed or the feature needs to be supported.

-Brett