On Mon, 3 Jan 2022 22:40:25 -0800
"Gregory P. Smith" <greg@krypto.org> wrote:
>
> rerunning a mere few of those in --rigorous mode for more runs does not
> significantly improve the stddev so I'm not going to let that finish.

The one benchmark that is bigint-heavy is pidigits AFAIK, so you might
want to re-run that one if you want a more rigorous confirmation that
there is no regression.

> my recommendation: proceed with removing 15-bit bignum digit support.
> 30-bit only future with simpler better code here we come.

Sounds reasonable to me as well.

Regards

Antoine.


_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-leave@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/
Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/MRE5HF3XRKJBEHF3YJNGXWXECLX7GQGG/
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/