7 Sep
2017
7 Sep
'17
9:25 p.m.
On Thu, Sep 7, 2017, at 14:19, Freddy Rietdijk wrote:
The main objection to that model is that it requires modifying source timestamps, which isn't possible for builds on read-only source trees.
Why not set the source timestamps of the source trees to say 1 first?
If the source-tree is readonly (because you don't want your build system to modify source files on principal), you cannot do that.