On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 5:09 AM, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis@pitrou.net> wrote:
Le Thu, 26 Sep 2013 10:28:46 -0400,
Benjamin Peterson <benjamin@python.org> a écrit :
> 2013/9/26 Eli Bendersky <eliben@gmail.com>:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Earlier this morning I had a slight tackle with a couple of the 3.4
> > bots (sorry everyone!). I fixed some problems in asdl.py -
> > http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/21d46e3ae60c - and used the 'with'
> > statement. Some bots don't have Python 2.6+ and couldn't bootstrap
> > Python-ast.h/c
> >
> > Two questions:
> >
> > * Should I always check-in Python-ast.h and Python-ast.c when I
> > touch asdl* ? The generated files are unchanged, it's only the
> > timestamp that changed.
> > * Can we, in theory, use new Pythons for asdl* code, because
> > Python-ast.* are, in fact, checked in so they don't have to be
> > rebuilt by the bots or users?
>
> We should have the buildbots run "make touch", so they don't need to
> run asdl_c.py.

So, you're gonna like this:

hg --config extensions.touch=Tools/hg/hgtouch.py touch -v
Tools/hg/hgtouch.py:21: Warning: 'with' will become a reserved keyword in Python 2.6
*** failed to import extension touch from Tools/hg/hgtouch.py: invalid syntax (hgtouch.py, line 21)
hg: unknown command 'touch'

http://buildbot.python.org/all/buildslaves/bolen-ubuntu

(that buildbot runs Ubuntu 8.04 LTS, for the record)

We have to define a clear boundary between what needs to be compatible to old Pythons and what doesn't. As far as auto-generated files are concerned, once we set up the bots properly and fix the .hgtouch bugs, there's no reason for anyone to need an old Python for anything except the hgtouch extension itself. But the latter has to be back-ported to work on older Pythons (I suppose from 2.4, or is there reason to go earlier?)

FWIW Antoine, I'll be happy to help with the buildbot setup, but you'll have to tell me how to get access to our buildbot scripts :-)

Eli