On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 12:04 PM, Lennart Regebro firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 12:02, Tarek Ziadé email@example.com wrote:
-1. This looks like typos the developer made on his versions definitions.
And if not, is subject to errors by forgetting dashes or dots.
Eh, yeah but that goes for ANY syntax.
Having the same syntax as for package specifications does make sense, though. (So we should clearly change that one too, eh?)
I don't think we need to change the syntax in fact. The current one, with simple operators covers the needs as far as I see.
What was fuzzy is the meaning of version strings like "2.5".
Once it's clarified (and it seems we have a better definition already since a few mails), I think the current syntax works naturally with ranges.