Is this a recommended workflow at this point, or should we generate/attach patch files still? Both, for experimentation?
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 1:15 PM, "Martin v. Löwis" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> As a mercurial user, I thank you for this effort! One question,All patches should go to the bug tracker. If you host a clone somewhere,
> where/how do I send suggestion to what to add into .hgignore file? In
> particular, I found these dynamically generated files after a build in
> Windows (3.2) that probably should be entered as .hgignore entries:
you could start publishing patches by referring to a remote repository,
rather than uploading the diff. I'm curious how this DVCS thing works
out for contributors.