data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/65a20/65a208f9b81553487a1be8a613e2e9d9e742f8d3" alt=""
Guido van Rossum wrote:
Anyway, the conclusion seems to be:
- You violated the process as commonly understood by checking in a new module without sufficient consensus.
- What you checked in is no good; it needs to be redesigned and renamed.
- If you absolutely do not want to use the patch manager for this, you can check it in under the nondist/sandbox part of the tree.
I'd add one more thing: there seems to be enough confusion and disagreement that this probably should be a PEP. -- --- Aahz (@pobox.com) Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6 <*> http://www.rahul.net/aahz/ Androgynous poly kinky vanilla queer het Pythonista I don't really mind a person having the last whine, but I do mind someone else having the last self-righteous whine.