On Sat, Aug 19, 2017, 01:43 Antoine Pitrou <solipsis@pitrou.net> wrote:
On Fri, 18 Aug 2017 16:33:27 -0400 Yury Selivanov <yselivanov.ml@gmail.com> wrote:
There are a few open questions left, namely the terminology and design of ContextKey API. On the former topic, I'm quite happy with the latest version: Execution Context, Logical Context, and Context Key.
I don't really like it. "Logical Context" is vague (there are lots of things called "context" in other libraries, so a bit of specificity would help avoid confusion), and it's not clear what is "logical" about it anyway. "Local Context" actually seemed better to me (as it reminded of threading.local() or the general notion of thread-local storage).
I have to admit that I didn't even pick up on that name change. I could go either way. I do appreciate dropping ContextItem, though, because "CI" makes me think of continuous integration. And the overall shape of the API for public consumption LGTM. -brett
Regards
Antoine.
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/brett%40python.org