[Barry Warsaw]
Thanks! I thought it was cute. It was just something that occurred to me as I was reviewing some existing code. The intent wasn’t to use `subdirs` outside of the assert statement, but I’m warm to it because it means I don’t have to do wasted work outside of the assert statement, or repeat myself in the assert message part.
Because the latter ("repeat myself") is probably more tempting, I'll just note that the "laziness" of using an assignment expression instead may well have nudged you toward writing _better_ code too. assert len(subdirs := list(path.iterdir())) == 0, subdirs Assuming the result of list(path.iterdir()) can change over time (seems very likely), assert len(list(path.iterdir())) == 0, list(path.iterdir()) _could_ end up both triggering and displaying an empty list in the exception detail. The assignment-expression version cannot.