On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 12:12 AM, Maciej Fijalkowski <fijall@gmail.com> wrote:
I like this wording far more. It's at the very least far more precise. Those examples are fair enough (except the fact that PyPy is not 32bit x86 only, the JIT is). [snip] "slower than US on some workloads" is true, while not really telling much to a potential reader. For any X and Y implementing the same language "X is faster than Y on some workloads" is usually true.
To be precise you would need to include the above table in the PEP, which is probably a bit too much, given that PEP is not about PyPy at all. I'm fine with any wording that is at least correct.
I've updated the language: http://codereview.appspot.com/186247/diff2/9005:11001/11002. Thanks for the clarifications. Collin Winter