Guido van Rossum wrote:
This looks good. Please make the appropriate changes to the PEP and to PEP 0 to mark it as accepted.
I should get to that in the next day or two. Thanks.
I think the implementation is fine too (others will have to check it more carefully) but I noticed that the promised functionality of -m doesn't work yet
It turns out one of the code paths through runpy wasn't getting tested properly, and naturally it was the path that the -m switch relies on. I've posted a new patch which both fixes that code path and adds additional tests to make sure it is doing the right thing. Cheers, Nick. PEP 366 implementation patch (http://bugs.python.org/issue1487) -- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia --------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.boredomandlaziness.org