
May 18, 2005
10:05 p.m.
So at this point it seems your proposal is just nailing down specifics for the open parts of PEP 325.
Or PEP 288? That has throw() (albeit with a different signature). I could do without the attributes though (PEP 342 provides a much better solution IMO).
If either of those PEP authors feels like updating their PEP, they have my blessings! I probably won't get to writing my own for a few more days.
Okay, I volunteer to recast PEP 288 to encompass your combined proposal. Will tackle it in the morning. Raymond