data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/98972/989726b670c074dad357f74770b5bbf840b6471a" alt=""
Jan. 18, 2004
3:15 p.m.
On Sun, Jan 18, 2004, Raymond Hettinger wrote:
The CJK codecs are essentially invisible to most users. However, its availability will increase python's acceptance in places where it is not currently being used. Increasing the user base should not have to wait for Py2.4.
That's not the question. IIUC, there are already some kind of CJK codecs available; this is a different set of codecs. Unless these new codecs produce the same results, we can't afford to switch. -- Aahz (aahz@pythoncraft.com) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/ A: No. Q: Is top-posting okay?