March 21, 2010
5:02 p.m.
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 9:53 AM, Guido van Rossum <guido@python.org> wrote:
Which I still have to review. (Mark, if you're there, could you make a brief post here on the mathematical definition of the new hash you're proposing, and why it is both efficient to compute and good (enough) as a hash function?)
Never mind, Mark. I found your explanation here: http://codereview.appspot.com/660042/diff/19001/11009?column_width=80 -- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)