Yes, see the followup. My comments before were all misinterpreting size_t.
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 7:27 AM, Gregory P. Smith <greg@krypto.org> wrote:It looks to me as though the struct size *is* changed, at least on
> So changing the definition of the dummy side of the union makes zero
> difference to already compiled code as it (a) doesn't change the structure's
> size and (b) all existing implementations already align these on an 8 byte
> boundary.
some platforms. Before this commit, I get (OS X 10.6, 64-bit
non-debug build):
Python 3.4.0a0 (default:b4c383f31881+, Dec 14 2012, 08:30:39)
[GCC 4.2.1 (Apple Inc. build 5664)] on darwin
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>>> class A(object): pass
...
>>> a = A()
>>> import sys
>>> sys.getsizeof(a)
64
After it:
Python 3.4.0a0 (default:76bc92fb90c1+, Dec 14 2012, 08:33:48)
[GCC 4.2.1 (Apple Inc. build 5664)] on darwin
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>>> class A(object): pass
...
>>> a = A()
>>> import sys
>>> sys.getsizeof(a)
56
--
Mark