On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 16:37, Jim Jewett
<jimjjewett@gmail.com> wrote:
I understand the need to ship without source -- but why does that
require supporting .pyc (or .pyo) -only?
Couldn't vendors just replace the real .py files with empty files?
Because if someone screws up the mod time on the source files the .pyc files will get recreated silently.
-Brett
Then no one would need the extra stat call, and no one would be bitten
by orphaned .pyc files after a rename.
[Yes, zips could still allow unmatched names; yes, it would be helpful
if a tool were available to sync the last-modification time; yes a
deprecation release should still be needed.]
-jJ
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/brett%40python.org