Le 17/08/2014 20:08, Nick Coghlan a écrit :
On 18 Aug 2014 09:57, "Barry Warsaw" <barry@python.org <mailto:barry@python.org>> wrote:
On Aug 18, 2014, at 09:12 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
I'm talking more generally - do you *really* want to be explaining that "bytes" behaves like a tuple of integers, while "bytes.bytes"
behaves like
a tuple of bytes?
I would explain it differently though, using concrete examples.
data = bytes(...) for i in data: # iterate over data as integers for i in data.bytes: # iterate over data as bytes
But whatever. I just wish there was something better than iterbytes.
There's actually another aspect to your idea, independent of the naming: exposing a view rather than just an iterator.
So that view would actually be the bytes object done right? Funny :-) Will it have lazy slicing? Regards Antoine.