You can add me to the list of people who feel like disappearing.

On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 10:28 AM, Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> wrote:
On 6/11/2016 11:34 AM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
In terms of API design, I'd prefer a flag to os.urandom() indicating a
preference for
- blocking
- raising an exception
- weaker random bits

+100 ;-)

I proposed exactly this 2 days ago, 5 hours after Larry's initial post.

'''
I think the 'new API' should be a parameter, not a new function. With just two choices, 'wait' = True/False  could work.  If 'raise an exception' were added, then
'action (when good bits are not immediately available' =
'return (best possible)' or
'wait (until have good bits)' or
'raise (CryptBitsNotAvailable)'

In either case, there would then be the question of whether the default should match 3.5.0/1 or 3.4 and before.
'''

Deciding on this then might have saved some hurt feelings, to the point where two contributors feel like disappearing, and a release manager must feel the same.  In any case, Guido already picked 3.4 behavior as the default.  Can we agree and move on?

--
Terry Jan Reedy



--
--Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)