I don't like consuming the iterator in the exception case. You might expect just one, but have a fallback approach for more. You could build the safer behavior using itertools.tee() or itertools.chain()._______________________________________________On Mon, Jul 27, 2020, 3:10 PM Noam Yorav-Raphael <noamraph@gmail.com> wrote:_______________________________________________Hi,There's a simple function that I use many times, and I think may be a good fit to be added to itertools. A function that gets an iterator, and if it has exactly one element returns it, and otherwise raises an exception. This is very useful for cases where I do some sort of query that I expect to get exactly one result, and I want an exception to be raised if I'm wrong. For example:jack = one(p for p in people if p.id == '1234')sqlalchemy already has such a function for queries: https://docs.sqlalchemy.org/en/13/orm/query.html#sqlalchemy.orm.query.Query.oneThis is my implementation:def one(iterable):
it = iter(iterable)
try:
r = next(it)
except StopIteration:
raise ValueError("Iterator is empty")
try:
next(it)
except StopIteration:
return r
else:
raise ValueError("Iterator has more than one item")What do you think?Thanks,Noam
Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-leave@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/
Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/D52MPKLIN4VEXBOCKVMTWAK66MAOEINY/
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-leave@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/
Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/N75BG5XVXKENVWAPU4K5UP4I3DKXTITO/
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/