At best it shows that deprecations are complicated no matter how well you
plan them. I remember that "noisy by default" deprecation warnings were
widely despised.
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 6:49 AM Antoine Pitrou
Hi,
My colleagues Tomáš Hrnčiar and Miro Hrončok made good progress on updating Python 3.10 to Python 3.11 in Fedora, but some specific Python 3.11 incompatible changes are causing more troubles than others: https://discuss.python.org/t/experience-with-python-3-11-in-fedora/12911
We propose to revert the following 2 changes in Python 3.11 and postpone them in a later Python version, once most projects will be compatible with these changes:
* Removal of unittest aliases (bpo-45162): it broke 61 Fedora packages * Removals from configparser module (bpo-45173) - broke 28 Fedora
On Tue, 18 Jan 2022 15:17:41 +0100 Victor Stinner
wrote: packages Doesn't this show, once again, that making DeprecationWarning silent by default was a mistake?
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-leave@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/AQHDYW4R... Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
-- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido) *Pronouns: he/him **(why is my pronoun here?)* http://feministing.com/2015/02/03/how-using-they-as-a-singular-pronoun-can-c...