26 Oct
2004
26 Oct
'04
8:05 a.m.
"Phillip J. Eby" pje@telecommunity.com writes:
At 12:31 PM 10/26/04 +0100, Michael Hudson wrote:
"Phillip J. Eby" pje@telecommunity.com writes:
At 09:36 AM 10/25/04 -0700, Guido van Rossum wrote:
Well, then perhaps code object comparison (and function object comparison) ought to work the same as 'is', not try to do something clever?
+1
Isn't that what function objects do now? (for some value of "now")
Probably. I don't see the relavence, though.
Because Guido sounded like he was saying that function objects didn't already do that.
Uh, yeah, I clearly wrote that post before I'd drunk enough coffee...
Cheers, mwh
--
Java sucks. [...] Java on TV set top boxes will suck so hard it
might well inhale people from off their sofa until their heads
get wedged in the card slots. --- Jon Rabone, ucam.chat