Jan. 26, 2004
5:15 p.m.
On Mon, 2004-01-26 at 16:55, Guido van Rossum wrote:
It's not a pronouncement -- it's just a recommendation. I see no need to start converting existing code to optparse -- but for all new code, I recommend it.
Maybe the documentation should point people in the direction of optparse (e.g. by moving the optparse section ahead of getopt and putting a note like: This module exists primarily for backwards compatibility - the optparse module is recommended for all new code. at the top of the getopt section). Mark